Showing posts with label cosmetic labels. Show all posts
Showing posts with label cosmetic labels. Show all posts
Wednesday, October 24, 2012
ingredient spotlight: avocado
When I think AVOCADOS, I think LOCAL.
Did you know 95% of all avocados grown in the USA come from California?! Carpinteria, California is a laid back beach town just South of Santa Barbara, where we recently opened The Grapeseed Co. store #2 and warehouse. We have been loving it here for many reasons, including that it is chock full of avocado groves and happens to be home to the wonderful California Avocado Festival each fall! Avocados are an amazing fruit loaded with omegas and vitamins, native to our area. The Grapeseed Company incorporates local ingredients in all of our formulas, and one of our most recent additions to make your skin healthy and happy is the AVOCADO! Here's why it's great for your skin...
botanical name: (or how we are required by FDA to list "avocado"on the label)
Persea Gratissima oil
botanical benefits in skin care:
Avocados are a superfood that are sometimes known as "fruit with fat" because they're so meaty and moisturizing. Avocados are rich in omega-3 fatty acids and vitamin e which makes them an excellent anti~aging ingredient. Avocado oil easily penetrates and absorbs into the skin. It has a reputation of helping psoriasis and eczema, as well as acneic, mature and aging skin conditions... which means (like grapeseed oil) it's great for just about any skin type.
find it in...
Cali Vine Decadently Rich Face Cream
Thursday, February 23, 2012
logic, lead, lipstick and legislation
In December 2011, the FDA published an updated report on lead levels in over 400 brands of lipstick
and found the average concentration to be 1.11ppm (parts per million), just a mere .04ppm higher than the study conducted in 2009 where the average was reported at 1.07ppm. These results weren't exactly newsworthy, given they are essentially the same. Right before Valentine's Day, the Campaign for
Safe Cosmetics (CSC) and Environmental Working Group (EWG) started
riling up the media with scary headlines about the danger of lead levels in
lipstick. I must give props to the CSC PR team, who resurfaced and
twisted the FDA report on a timely date when people may be focusing a
bit more on their pucker, but where's the logic here?
I'm taking a moment to step away from the science behind what's going on lately in the cosmetics industry and the media to examine the logical side of it. While earning my Master of Science degree, I learned the process of collecting, examining, interpreting data and drawing conclusions in both qualitative and quantitative methods. It was my single best take away from my previous profession because it has endless applications. Logically, I do not understand how the CSC has twisted the new data on lead in lipstick so drastically and the media has jumped right in and turned it into a fear-mongering frenzy.
The data does not show anything new...
Yes, there are trace amounts of lead in lipstick.
And your drinking water.
And the soil we grow food in.
And the air we breathe.
I've been thinking a lot about the multiple previous attempts to pass safe cosmetics legislation and how this ties in to product labeling, and the latest media scare around lead. One of the main provisions the CSC and EWG are pushing for is stricter guidelines around labeling to show trace amounts of substances that make up an ingredient. We do not even have this type of labeling scrutiny in place for the food we eat, which we all know (both scientifically and logically) is entering our bodies by ingestion. Forget skin absorption from cosmetics, folks! Why is our government being tied up with scrutinizing lipstick in the name of "health" and "safety"? Bottom line, life is full of choices, and wearing lipstick is a choice, not a necessity.
Eating, drinking, and breathing on the other hand are not choices. We must fuel and hydrate our bodies and breathe to continue to be alive. Let's gain some logic, perspective and focus as we move forward with what is legally considered safe and healthy in personal care and cosmetics. If there is so much concern about what you are choosing to apply externally to your body, shouldn't we be examining the sources we need to ingest internally to sustain life first?
These folks have covered both the scientific and the rational sides of the "lead in lipstick issue" if you're interested in reading more:
Dene Godfrey, Trever Butterworth, Robert Tisserand, John Hurson, PCPC via Skin Inc and there are more I'm missing so please add your links. As always, I recommend www.PersonalCareTruth.com as a great balanced, science based resource on legislative issues too.
who's dodging a bullet?
The data does not show anything new...
Yes, there are trace amounts of lead in lipstick.
And your drinking water.
And the soil we grow food in.
And the air we breathe.
I've been thinking a lot about the multiple previous attempts to pass safe cosmetics legislation and how this ties in to product labeling, and the latest media scare around lead. One of the main provisions the CSC and EWG are pushing for is stricter guidelines around labeling to show trace amounts of substances that make up an ingredient. We do not even have this type of labeling scrutiny in place for the food we eat, which we all know (both scientifically and logically) is entering our bodies by ingestion. Forget skin absorption from cosmetics, folks! Why is our government being tied up with scrutinizing lipstick in the name of "health" and "safety"? Bottom line, life is full of choices, and wearing lipstick is a choice, not a necessity.
Eating, drinking, and breathing on the other hand are not choices. We must fuel and hydrate our bodies and breathe to continue to be alive. Let's gain some logic, perspective and focus as we move forward with what is legally considered safe and healthy in personal care and cosmetics. If there is so much concern about what you are choosing to apply externally to your body, shouldn't we be examining the sources we need to ingest internally to sustain life first?
These folks have covered both the scientific and the rational sides of the "lead in lipstick issue" if you're interested in reading more:
Dene Godfrey, Trever Butterworth, Robert Tisserand, John Hurson, PCPC via Skin Inc and there are more I'm missing so please add your links. As always, I recommend www.PersonalCareTruth.com as a great balanced, science based resource on legislative issues too.
Wednesday, September 21, 2011
Do you speak INCI? How to Read a Cosmetic Label
Do you speak INCI?
If you studied Latin...maybe.
If you work in the field of cosmetics, maybe.
INCI is the language of cosmetics; it's actually an acronym that stands for International Nomenclature of Cosmetic Ingredients. A few years back The Campaign for Safe Cosmetics came out with the slogan, "if you can't pronounce it, don't use it" at Expo West, the biggest natural trade show in the USA. I remember seeing their banner on the trade show floor after attending their meeting the day before and thinking... huh?!? They were telling people not to use products that follow Federal Labeling Laws.
This was mind boggling to those of us that work in the field because FDA cosmetic labeling guidelines state that every personal care product needs to be labeled by it's cosmetic INCI name. I'm not sure why this lobbying group would so blatantly advise against following federal law, but they instantly lost any credibility gained during their meeting when I saw that banner. Anyhoo, one thing that did for sure was confuse a lot of people in the land of comprehending cosmetics labels in a time when green products were rapidly gaining popularity and becoming mainstream. Every ingredient, even if it's certified organic, 100% natural, needs to be labeled using INCI names.
Cosmetic companies are not trying to confuse you or make things fancy-shmancy, they are following the law by using INCI names. INCI's purpose is to identify what's in the ingredient deck whether you are looking at a product from Germany or Mexico. To comply with the law and help the common consumer's understanding, many cosmetics manufacturers label their products by both the INCI and common name, like we do at The Grapeseed Co. Let's take a look at one of our most basic ingredient deck labels (it contains just two 100% natural ingredients) and point out what's important to understand when trying to read a cosmetics label!
(this is as big as I could format the label to fit in the post. To see the examples up close, you can click on the label to enlarge rather than pull out your magnifying glass!)
How to Read Personal Care Labels
#1 When trying to figure out what the heck is in your product, look for what's in the (parenthesis) in the ingredients. This is usually the common name you know the ingredient by.
#2 If you are concerned with certain ingredients, pay attention to where they fall in the ingredient listing. Ingredients need to be listed by concentration in the formula, so something that is one of the last few ingredients is most likely under 1% of the entire formulation. *The label above is an exception to this statement- if there are just a few ingredients in the formula (this only has 2) then the last ingredient is probably over 1%. You can read more about the FDAs requirements for how manufacturers must list ingredients here.
#3 Look at the open container symbol. This will tell you how long the product is fresh after opening.
#4 If you are concerned where your product is coming from, look at the manufacturer and distributor info. Is your face cream manufactured by the company that sells it? If it says "distributed by" this means the company does not manufacture the product, someone else does, and the company that sells it is therefore the distributor.
I hope this simplifies things when you are trying to decode what's in your face wash. Just remember, reading cosmetics labels isn't rocket science, it's just knowing what to look for. What other questions do you have about cosmetics labels?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)